I missed part of Peter Crocker’s session on Advanced Java Topics in WMB v6 yesterday, but when I did manage to get in there, I learned a few useful snippets. Essentially this was an update of his talk from last year, and riffed off of his developerWorks article on the use of Java in Message Broker.
A few of the notes I made:
- although the product ships a sample JavaCompute node that calls a Google API, Google themselves have now withdrawn the API, so the sample doesn’t work
- it is important to be careful with the use of XPath… for example, try to avoid using the // selector as it is usually not the most performant way to select a message element. There should be some articles around on XPath, I need to look up some useful references.
- The latest fixpack enables Java code in a JavaCompute node to propagate to a label in the flow.
Useful stuff to be aware of!
9 responses so far ↓
marten.gustafson » Route to label from Java Compute Node // April 26, 2007 at 21:26 |
[...] to Andys’s post I was reminded of the “propagate to label” feature of Java Compute Nodes in WebSphere [...]
Wibble-man // April 27, 2007 at 21:15 |
Riffed is not a word. Ripped is a word. I think you meant ripped.
Peter Crocker // April 27, 2007 at 21:21 |
Never thought of myself as a riffer.
Glad you found the presentation useful.
Peter Crocker // April 27, 2007 at 21:23 |
Who is this wibbler
Andy Piper // April 27, 2007 at 21:24 |
I’m considering whether to out the mysterious Wibble-man… he is incorrect. Riffed is a word, and I meant it.
Shakespeare was considered a genius for his use of the English language. All I can say is that I’m clearly misunderstood.
Michael Reeve // April 30, 2007 at 8:31 |
All this fuss over the word “riffed” while the non-word “performant” is right in the middle there.
Actually, that’s not true – “performant” is a noun, but it seems to be increasingly used as an adjective when the word “efficient” would fit the bill appositely.
Andy Piper // April 30, 2007 at 13:58 |
Aggh. You’re right. I’m going all American…
kellyd // May 1, 2007 at 23:59 |
performant?
jaroa // May 31, 2007 at 23:23 |
Performant ??